Will iPhone Four’s Audio and Movie Talk Ultimately Break the Voice Calling Scam?

Get The

6 months for $Five – plus a FREE Portable

WIRED’s thickest stories, delivered to your inbox.

• 13 hours

How to tell if your roomy is using your computer: bit.ly/2wY2MxZ

Go after Us

Don’t miss our latest news, features and movies.

We’re On

See what’s inspiring us.

Go after Us

Don’t miss out on WIRED’s latest movies.

Will iPhone Four’s Audio and Movie Talk Ultimately Break the Voice Calling Scam?

A front-facing iPhone camera means movie calling, but it’s also a sign of something fatter. Combined with other latest leaks, it means that Apple is bringing iChat to the iPhone. Everything about voice calling may be about to switch.

iChat, You Talk

So, how does the appearance of a front-facing camera switch standard voice calling? Let’s connect the dots:

• Front-facing camera means movie calling
• Leaks suggest movie calling is part of overall iChat
• iChat software and fresh VOIP provisions in OS means voice talk, too (maybe even for older iPhones)
• iChat branding, arrival of iPad and fresh OS multitasking all suggest compatibility with desktop app and standard friend lists
• iPhone-to-desktop compatibility means everybody talks to everybody, no special plans needed

As I’ve said before, voice calling and SMS are both just part of the data stream, and don’t deserve special treatment. Now, when there’s a well-designed unified iChat client presenting an alternative to traditional calling and messaging, those old systems will become inconveniences.

If Apple manages to do this right, and that’s still a big if, they will ultimately provide a more human way to communicate: Pick a person, and reach out. The “how”—whether you use text, voice or video—should be of less importance than the “who.”

Why Is Movie Talk So Hard?

Make no mistake, this is about software, not hardware. There have been front-facing cameras on 3G-capable phones for ages, and many a carrier has attempted to market movie streaming—for a price. But if you recall AT&T had real-time Movie Share, but it was only one-way, only worked with AT&T, and even then, required special phones and plans. In Europe, where two-way movie calling was attempted more broadly, many have already written it off on phones as a frustration and a flop.

The hardware is here, the network, in many respects, is here, but the wise way to bring it all together and make it work — that’s what’s been missing.It’s effortless to say why individual initiatives don’t work: Even text messaging didn’t take off when people couldn’t send messages to people on other carriers. One-way movie is creepy, violating the unspoken agreement that if you get to see me, I need to see you too. And of course, movie talk on computers, via strong broadband connections, can still be awful, so how do you ensure vid quality on a network that can’t even assure that calls won’t drop?

Carriers and handset makers have up till now blamed high prices and lack of marketing support, however one Nokia exec mentioned that the entire pointing-a-phone-at-your-head-and-talking thing was awkward, and not very “flattering.”

Apple has to face all of these obstacles as it takes its turn at bat, even if it is a company known for succeeding where others have failed, especially where human-friendly software engineering and design are worried. But my guess is that they’re not in this for the cellphone-based movie talk.

Movie Talk Is Just The Gateway

On the Mac, movie talk is just one dish on the iChat menu, a menu that also contains instant text messages and voice talking. (There’s even screen sharing and other frills that may end up on a phone or pad near you.) I contend that while movie talk is a neat thing to do, at least once, the existence of a front-facing camera suggests this entire lineup of features.

If we can grab our phones, pull up the pal list we see on our computers, and engage in a movie call, then why wouldn’t we also be able to do a quick text talk? And if we can do both of those things, what’s to stop us from just doing voice calling? And if I can voice call all my buddies—be they on their computers, on their iPads or on their phones—from my phone using an iChat client, I may never make a regular real phone call again.

It may sound like a fantasy, but Apple has already laid the groundwork for third parties to make this stuff happen, so why shouldn’t they put it in their own flagship mobile iChat app?

If Apple Doesn’t Do It, Skype Will

During the iPhone OS four unveiling, Steve Jobs made room for a Skype demo displaying how the VOIP service could work in the background, receiving calls while you did other things on your phone (or, ostensibly, your iPad). Not only does this tell me that Skype is busy devising dramatic uses for iPhones that will fully workaround AT&T’s voice calling, it also tells me that Apple condones it to the point of promoting it early and often. And speaking of AT&T, the carrier already permits VOIP over 3G. While that can presently be found in primitive form through Skype using Fring, it it truly means that a fresh Skype iPhone client will not only run in the background of your iPhone, but will run regardless of what network you’re on.

We’re already excited about this, so what about that camera? Will Apple give Skype access to the camera? My sense is that it will either be tied exclusively to a very powerful iChat client, or it will be suggested loosely to developers. Apple wouldn’t go to all the trouble to put a 2nd camera in if they didn’t think the thing would get mileage.

Let’s face it, iChat may not be the ideal multi-protocol messaging app for the Mac, so there’s a good chance it won’t do amazing things for the iPhone. But if there’s a healthy coop-etition inbetween Apple’s own development and the best developers in the desktop space—not just Skype and Fring but Adium and Cerulean and Meebo—then who’s to say that soon, there won’t be a handful of good options? You’ve heard me say that voice messaging and SMS charges are a scam—a fine iChat client for the iPhone would soon render them a sham, too.

Will iPhone four – s Audio and Movie Talk Eventually Break the Voice Calling Scam, WIRED

Will iPhone Four’s Audio and Movie Talk Eventually Break the Voice Calling Scam?

Get The

6 months for $Five – plus a FREE Portable

WIRED’s largest stories, delivered to your inbox.

• 13 hours

How to tell if your roomy is using your computer: bit.ly/2wY2MxZ

Go after Us

Don’t miss our latest news, features and movies.

We’re On

See what’s inspiring us.

Go after Us

Don’t miss out on WIRED’s latest movies.

Will iPhone Four’s Audio and Movie Talk Ultimately Break the Voice Calling Scam?

A front-facing iPhone camera means movie calling, but it’s also a sign of something thicker. Combined with other latest leaks, it means that Apple is bringing iChat to the iPhone. Everything about voice calling may be about to switch.

iChat, You Talk

So, how does the appearance of a front-facing camera switch standard voice calling? Let’s connect the dots:

• Front-facing camera means movie calling
• Leaks suggest movie calling is part of overall iChat
• iChat software and fresh VOIP provisions in OS means voice talk, too (maybe even for older iPhones)
• iChat branding, arrival of iPad and fresh OS multitasking all suggest compatibility with desktop app and standard mate lists
• iPhone-to-desktop compatibility means everybody talks to everybody, no special plans needed

As I’ve said before, voice calling and SMS are both just part of the data stream, and don’t deserve special treatment. Now, when there’s a well-designed unified iChat client presenting an alternative to traditional calling and messaging, those old systems will become inconveniences.

If Apple manages to do this right, and that’s still a big if, they will eventually provide a more human way to communicate: Pick a person, and reach out. The “how”—whether you use text, voice or video—should be of less importance than the “who.”

Why Is Movie Talk So Hard?

Make no mistake, this is about software, not hardware. There have been front-facing cameras on 3G-capable phones for ages, and many a carrier has attempted to market movie streaming—for a price. But if you recall AT&T had real-time Movie Share, but it was only one-way, only worked with AT&T, and even then, required special phones and plans. In Europe, where two-way movie calling was attempted more broadly, many have already written it off on phones as a frustration and a flop.

The hardware is here, the network, in many respects, is here, but the wise way to bring it all together and make it work — that’s what’s been missing.It’s effortless to say why individual initiatives don’t work: Even text messaging didn’t take off when people couldn’t send messages to people on other carriers. One-way movie is creepy, violating the unspoken agreement that if you get to see me, I need to see you too. And of course, movie talk on computers, via strong broadband connections, can still be awful, so how do you ensure vid quality on a network that can’t even assure that calls won’t drop?

Carriers and handset makers have up till now blamed high prices and lack of marketing support, however one Nokia exec mentioned that the entire pointing-a-phone-at-your-head-and-talking thing was awkward, and not very “flattering.”

Apple has to face all of these obstacles as it takes its turn at bat, even if it is a company known for succeeding where others have failed, especially where human-friendly software engineering and design are worried. But my guess is that they’re not in this for the cellphone-based movie talk.

Movie Talk Is Just The Gateway

On the Mac, movie talk is just one dish on the iChat menu, a menu that also contains instant text messages and voice talking. (There’s even screen sharing and other frills that may end up on a phone or pad near you.) I contend that while movie talk is a neat thing to do, at least once, the existence of a front-facing camera suggests this entire lineup of features.

If we can grab our phones, pull up the pal list we see on our computers, and engage in a movie call, then why wouldn’t we also be able to do a quick text talk? And if we can do both of those things, what’s to stop us from just doing voice calling? And if I can voice call all my buddies—be they on their computers, on their iPads or on their phones—from my phone using an iChat client, I may never make a regular real phone call again.

It may sound like a fantasy, but Apple has already laid the groundwork for third parties to make this stuff happen, so why shouldn’t they put it in their own flagship mobile iChat app?

If Apple Doesn’t Do It, Skype Will

During the iPhone OS four unveiling, Steve Jobs made room for a Skype demo displaying how the VOIP service could work in the background, receiving calls while you did other things on your phone (or, ostensibly, your iPad). Not only does this tell me that Skype is busy devising dramatic uses for iPhones that will entirely workaround AT&T’s voice calling, it also tells me that Apple condones it to the point of promoting it early and often. And speaking of AT&T, the carrier already permits VOIP over 3G. While that can presently be found in primitive form through Skype using Fring, it it indeed means that a fresh Skype iPhone client will not only run in the background of your iPhone, but will run regardless of what network you’re on.

We’re already excited about this, so what about that camera? Will Apple give Skype access to the camera? My sense is that it will either be tied exclusively to a very powerful iChat client, or it will be suggested loosely to developers. Apple wouldn’t go to all the trouble to put a 2nd camera in if they didn’t think the thing would get mileage.

Let’s face it, iChat may not be the flawless multi-protocol messaging app for the Mac, so there’s a good chance it won’t do amazing things for the iPhone. But if there’s a healthy coop-etition inbetween Apple’s own development and the best developers in the desktop space—not just Skype and Fring but Adium and Cerulean and Meebo—then who’s to say that soon, there won’t be a handful of good options? You’ve heard me say that voice messaging and SMS charges are a scam—a good iChat client for the iPhone would soon render them a sham, too.

Will iPhone four – s Audio and Movie Talk Eventually Break the Voice Calling Scam, WIRED

Will iPhone Four’s Audio and Movie Talk Eventually Break the Voice Calling Scam?

Get The

6 months for $Five – plus a FREE Portable

WIRED’s thickest stories, delivered to your inbox.

• 13 hours

How to tell if your roomie is using your computer: bit.ly/2wY2MxZ

Go after Us

Don’t miss our latest news, features and movies.

We’re On

See what’s inspiring us.

Go after Us

Don’t miss out on WIRED’s latest movies.

Will iPhone Four’s Audio and Movie Talk Eventually Break the Voice Calling Scam?

A front-facing iPhone camera means movie calling, but it’s also a sign of something fatter. Combined with other latest leaks, it means that Apple is bringing iChat to the iPhone. Everything about voice calling may be about to switch.

iChat, You Talk

So, how does the appearance of a front-facing camera switch standard voice calling? Let’s connect the dots:

• Front-facing camera means movie calling
• Leaks suggest movie calling is part of overall iChat
• iChat software and fresh VOIP provisions in OS means voice talk, too (maybe even for older iPhones)
• iChat branding, arrival of iPad and fresh OS multitasking all suggest compatibility with desktop app and standard acquaintance lists
• iPhone-to-desktop compatibility means everybody talks to everybody, no special plans needed

As I’ve said before, voice calling and SMS are both just part of the data stream, and don’t deserve special treatment. Now, when there’s a well-designed unified iChat client presenting an alternative to traditional calling and messaging, those old systems will become inconveniences.

If Apple manages to do this right, and that’s still a big if, they will ultimately provide a more human way to communicate: Pick a person, and reach out. The “how”—whether you use text, voice or video—should be of less importance than the “who.”

Why Is Movie Talk So Hard?

Make no mistake, this is about software, not hardware. There have been front-facing cameras on 3G-capable phones for ages, and many a carrier has attempted to market movie streaming—for a price. But if you recall AT&T had real-time Movie Share, but it was only one-way, only worked with AT&T, and even then, required special phones and plans. In Europe, where two-way movie calling was attempted more broadly, many have already written it off on phones as a frustration and a flop.

The hardware is here, the network, in many respects, is here, but the clever way to bring it all together and make it work — that’s what’s been missing.It’s effortless to say why individual initiatives don’t work: Even text messaging didn’t take off when people couldn’t send messages to people on other carriers. One-way movie is creepy, violating the unspoken agreement that if you get to see me, I need to see you too. And of course, movie talk on computers, via strong broadband connections, can still be awful, so how do you assure vid quality on a network that can’t even ensure that calls won’t drop?

Carriers and handset makers have up till now blamed high prices and lack of marketing support, however one Nokia exec mentioned that the entire pointing-a-phone-at-your-head-and-talking thing was awkward, and not very “flattering.”

Apple has to face all of these obstacles as it takes its turn at bat, even if it is a company known for succeeding where others have failed, especially where human-friendly software engineering and design are worried. But my guess is that they’re not in this for the cellphone-based movie talk.

Movie Talk Is Just The Gateway

On the Mac, movie talk is just one dish on the iChat menu, a menu that also contains instant text messages and voice talking. (There’s even screen sharing and other frills that may end up on a phone or pad near you.) I contend that while movie talk is a neat thing to do, at least once, the existence of a front-facing camera suggests this entire lineup of features.

If we can grab our phones, pull up the acquaintance list we see on our computers, and engage in a movie call, then why wouldn’t we also be able to do a quick text talk? And if we can do both of those things, what’s to stop us from just doing voice calling? And if I can voice call all my buddies—be they on their computers, on their iPads or on their phones—from my phone using an iChat client, I may never make a regular real phone call again.

It may sound like a fantasy, but Apple has already laid the groundwork for third parties to make this stuff happen, so why shouldn’t they put it in their own flagship mobile iChat app?

If Apple Doesn’t Do It, Skype Will

During the iPhone OS four unveiling, Steve Jobs made room for a Skype demo showcasing how the VOIP service could work in the background, receiving calls while you did other things on your phone (or, ostensibly, your iPad). Not only does this tell me that Skype is busy devising dramatic uses for iPhones that will fully workaround AT&T’s voice calling, it also tells me that Apple condones it to the point of promoting it early and often. And speaking of AT&T, the carrier already permits VOIP over 3G. While that can presently be found in primitive form through Skype using Fring, it it truly means that a fresh Skype iPhone client will not only run in the background of your iPhone, but will run regardless of what network you’re on.

We’re already excited about this, so what about that camera? Will Apple give Skype access to the camera? My sense is that it will either be tied exclusively to a very powerful iChat client, or it will be suggested loosely to developers. Apple wouldn’t go to all the trouble to put a 2nd camera in if they didn’t think the thing would get mileage.

Let’s face it, iChat may not be the ideal multi-protocol messaging app for the Mac, so there’s a good chance it won’t do amazing things for the iPhone. But if there’s a healthy coop-etition inbetween Apple’s own development and the best developers in the desktop space—not just Skype and Fring but Adium and Cerulean and Meebo—then who’s to say that soon, there won’t be a handful of good options? You’ve heard me say that voice messaging and SMS charges are a scam—a excellent iChat client for the iPhone would soon render them a sham, too.

Will iPhone four – s Audio and Movie Talk Ultimately Break the Voice Calling Scam, WIRED

Will iPhone Four’s Audio and Movie Talk Eventually Break the Voice Calling Scam?

Get The

6 months for $Five – plus a FREE Portable

WIRED’s fattest stories, delivered to your inbox.

• 13 hours

How to tell if your roomy is using your computer: bit.ly/2wY2MxZ

Go after Us

Don’t miss our latest news, features and movies.

We’re On

See what’s inspiring us.

Go after Us

Don’t miss out on WIRED’s latest movies.

Will iPhone Four’s Audio and Movie Talk Ultimately Break the Voice Calling Scam?

A front-facing iPhone camera means movie calling, but it’s also a sign of something thicker. Combined with other latest leaks, it means that Apple is bringing iChat to the iPhone. Everything about voice calling may be about to switch.

iChat, You Talk

So, how does the appearance of a front-facing camera switch standard voice calling? Let’s connect the dots:

• Front-facing camera means movie calling
• Leaks suggest movie calling is part of overall iChat
• iChat software and fresh VOIP provisions in OS means voice talk, too (maybe even for older iPhones)
• iChat branding, arrival of iPad and fresh OS multitasking all suggest compatibility with desktop app and standard pal lists
• iPhone-to-desktop compatibility means everybody talks to everybody, no special plans needed

As I’ve said before, voice calling and SMS are both just part of the data stream, and don’t deserve special treatment. Now, when there’s a well-designed unified iChat client presenting an alternative to traditional calling and messaging, those old systems will become inconveniences.

If Apple manages to do this right, and that’s still a big if, they will ultimately provide a more human way to communicate: Pick a person, and reach out. The “how”—whether you use text, voice or video—should be of less importance than the “who.”

Why Is Movie Talk So Hard?

Make no mistake, this is about software, not hardware. There have been front-facing cameras on 3G-capable phones for ages, and many a carrier has attempted to market movie streaming—for a price. But if you recall AT&T had real-time Movie Share, but it was only one-way, only worked with AT&T, and even then, required special phones and plans. In Europe, where two-way movie calling was attempted more broadly, many have already written it off on phones as a frustration and a flop.

The hardware is here, the network, in many respects, is here, but the clever way to bring it all together and make it work — that’s what’s been missing.It’s effortless to say why individual initiatives don’t work: Even text messaging didn’t take off when people couldn’t send messages to people on other carriers. One-way movie is creepy, violating the unspoken agreement that if you get to see me, I need to see you too. And of course, movie talk on computers, via strong broadband connections, can still be awful, so how do you assure vid quality on a network that can’t even assure that calls won’t drop?

Carriers and handset makers have up till now blamed high prices and lack of marketing support, tho’ one Nokia exec mentioned that the entire pointing-a-phone-at-your-head-and-talking thing was awkward, and not very “flattering.”

Apple has to face all of these obstacles as it takes its turn at bat, even if it is a company known for succeeding where others have failed, especially where human-friendly software engineering and design are worried. But my guess is that they’re not in this for the cellphone-based movie talk.

Movie Talk Is Just The Gateway

On the Mac, movie talk is just one dish on the iChat menu, a menu that also contains instant text messages and voice talking. (There’s even screen sharing and other frills that may end up on a phone or pad near you.) I contend that while movie talk is a neat thing to do, at least once, the existence of a front-facing camera suggests this entire lineup of features.

If we can grab our phones, pull up the acquaintance list we see on our computers, and engage in a movie call, then why wouldn’t we also be able to do a quick text talk? And if we can do both of those things, what’s to stop us from just doing voice calling? And if I can voice call all my buddies—be they on their computers, on their iPads or on their phones—from my phone using an iChat client, I may never make a regular real phone call again.

It may sound like a fantasy, but Apple has already laid the groundwork for third parties to make this stuff happen, so why shouldn’t they put it in their own flagship mobile iChat app?

If Apple Doesn’t Do It, Skype Will

During the iPhone OS four unveiling, Steve Jobs made room for a Skype demo showcasing how the VOIP service could work in the background, receiving calls while you did other things on your phone (or, ostensibly, your iPad). Not only does this tell me that Skype is busy devising dramatic uses for iPhones that will entirely workaround AT&T’s voice calling, it also tells me that Apple condones it to the point of promoting it early and often. And speaking of AT&T, the carrier already permits VOIP over 3G. While that can presently be found in primitive form through Skype using Fring, it it truly means that a fresh Skype iPhone client will not only run in the background of your iPhone, but will run regardless of what network you’re on.

We’re already excited about this, so what about that camera? Will Apple give Skype access to the camera? My sense is that it will either be tied exclusively to a very powerful iChat client, or it will be suggested loosely to developers. Apple wouldn’t go to all the trouble to put a 2nd camera in if they didn’t think the thing would get mileage.

Let’s face it, iChat may not be the flawless multi-protocol messaging app for the Mac, so there’s a good chance it won’t do amazing things for the iPhone. But if there’s a healthy coop-etition inbetween Apple’s own development and the best developers in the desktop space—not just Skype and Fring but Adium and Cerulean and Meebo—then who’s to say that soon, there won’t be a handful of good options? You’ve heard me say that voice messaging and SMS charges are a scam—a fine iChat client for the iPhone would soon render them a sham, too.

Related video: